Comments on: Nicole Long could have license revoked permanently

By: opinionated bit*h

opinionated bit*h — Tue, 03 Oct 2006 03:44:16 +0000

Yea she made a horrible mistake. But from what i hear she is unbelievably sorry for it. Lets not forget the fact that this guy was 17, about a month away from being 18. He knew right from wrong. He knew what he was doing as well as she did. He had no reguard for her or her family (neither one of them did in this instance). He isn’t at all innocent in this. They are BOTH to blame for extremely poor judgement. Don’t just blame one side. A 17 year old is more then capable of saying no. He didn’t say no and neither did she. As Diane said above, this guy had a record before any of this happened. He was in no way the innocent party. I’m not saying she is the victim ether. There is no question that they were BOTH wrong in doing this.

By: mikeb65

mikeb65 — Fri, 05 May 2006 19:28:32 +0000

Hey-she had her fun!

By: diane

diane — Wed, 03 May 2006 20:21:53 +0000

the student did not lose his scholarships to play sports (football) because of this. He was in trouble way before all of this came out. This didn’t come out until January. Why doesn’t anyone realize he wasn’t allowed to play football in August? Maybe because he has a previous record? His life is not ruined because of this. How about hers?

By: pepsionice

pepsionice — Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:00:54 +0000

Thats the curious thing about this deal…all of these women could have gone out with teenage guys…without the school job being in jeopardy. Just doesn’t add up…either these women are plain stupid or they really didn’t think they were getting into trouble.

By: mikeb65

mikeb65 — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:54:10 +0000

Now that she’s not a teacher any more she can do all the 17 year olds she wants to!